Our Philosophy of Training is built on integrating science, practice, and social responsiveness. We strive to ensure students have the knowledge, skills and attitudes to become a responsible agent of change. The program content is delivered through collaboration, mindfulness of power dynamics, respect for students’ unique individual intersecting identities, and with student centered supports at the core. Good relationship skills, self-reflection and awareness, openness and a willingness to grow and learn, and a commitment to the highest ethical standards are values that inform the climate and expectations of our program. We are inclusive, compassionate, intentional, and collaborative.
We believe that critically consuming scientific research to inform clinical practice (and using clinical experiences to form research questions) is imperative to being a psychologist and an agent of change. Thus, we use the Scholar-Practitioner Model to train students as local clinical scientists (Stricker & Trierweiler, 1995). A local clinical scientist is: “… a critical investigator who uses scientific research and methods, general scholarship, and personal and professional experience to develop plausible and communicable formulations of local phenomena. This investigator draws on scientific theory and research, general world knowledge, acute observational skills, and an open, skeptical stance toward the problem to conduct this inquiry” (p. 24- 25). This model is taught under the larger umbrella of Evidence Based Practice, relying on research evidence, client values and preferences, and clinical judgment to make the best clinical decisions for each unique client. We also believe that no client can be truly understood or assisted in therapy if their context is not understood and valued. Thus, we also infuse a Biopsychosociocultural approach in how we teach conceptualization and intervention.
As scholar-practitioners/local clinical scientists, we must critically and openly question what we know, how we know it, and what biases might be implicit in what we know, if we are to positively and meaningfully contribute to our ever-changing field, whether in clinical service, research, teaching, outreach, and/or advocacy. Our clinical work must always sit upon a scholarly foundation, and our scholarly pursuits, at their best, are informed by our work with clients.
Our Doctor of Psychology in Clinical Psychology program has been continuously accredited by the American Psychological Association (APA) since 1989. The program most recently received the maximum of 10 years of reaccreditation in 2017. For further information about the accreditation status of this or any other psychology doctoral program, please contact: APA Office of Program Consultation and Accreditation, American Psychological Association, 750 First Street NE, Washington DC 20002-4242, (202) 336-5979; apaaccred@apa.org; accreditation.apa.org/.